Quantcast
Channel: Urch Forums
Viewing all 6904 articles
Browse latest View live

PhD security at UCL, LSE vs. CEMFI, Tinbergen, BGSE

$
0
0
I received offers for MSc Economics at UCL, MSc Econometrics at LSE and PhD tracks at CEMFI,Tinbergen and BGSE.

I would like to continue in the PhD program after finishing the master's level and my research interests are labor and applied microeconomics.

I think that for labor and microeconomics, UCL and LSE would be the stronger programs (please correct me if you think otherwise). However, I am worried that I will have hard time getting a distinction and continuing in the PhD track. Moreover, I fear that even if I am able to get into the PhD track, I will not get funding and I will be forced to leave the program after all the work, while CEMFI and Tinbergen offer virtually complete security in staying in the program as well as funding (BGSE offers partial funding).

I was wondering if you guys have a better idea of what the chances for a distinction are and even more importantly, for getting funding at UCL or LSE after getting into the PhD track.

Do you think the risk of going to the London schools will pay off? Thank you so much for your help.

Which path should I follow? (RA vs Current Admissions)

$
0
0
Hello everybody! :shy:

As many of you I have to make important decisions in the following days. I’ll present my situation. Let’s see if you can help me a bit :D

I’ve done my applications to PhD/Master programs in economics (fall 2016). In the meanwhile, I accepted an offer for a position as RA at the Bank of Spain (Banco de España). So now, that I’m receiving the admissions/rejections, I’m trying to decide which of these 2 paths follow:


  1. Accept the best offer I get in this application period. Probably I’m talking about the Master in Economics and Finance at CEMFI or LSE’s EME. Still waiting with hope the outcomes of BU and UCSD though.
  2. Keep my position as RA and apply again for Fall 2017 or Fall 2018 (I could probably work in the bank untill January 2018). This could allow me to get a strong letter from my boss (PhD in LSE, head of the división) and I’d have some research related experience in my CV. Moreover, I could improve my GRE. Additionally, in the worst of cases, I’ll have saved enough money to study an european master for a year or two, if I dont get funding anywhere.


Two relevant notes:


  1. In the long run, I see myself researching in central banks, IMF, WB, OECD… more than in a university.
  2. I just got my bachelors, I’m 22, which makes me think there is no rush in starting my PhD this year.


Here is a profile evaluation thread I opened with more information about my profile: http://www.urch.com/forums/phd-econo...n-uc3m-us.html

Honestly, right now I tend to think 2 is the best path for me, but maybe I’m making a mistake if I reject the opportunity to study at LSE, CEMFI, BU or even UCSD!!! What do you think?

Thanks for your attention!!! Any piece of advise is highly appreciated <3

PD: I'm an international applicant.

Please review my gre issue essay

$
0
0
TOPIC: Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
ESSAY:
Everyone in this world was born with some kind of talent, but most of the times they were common among us like reading quickly, problem-solving etc. But, some people were born with exceptional talents which make them stand from rest of the world. Such people may get better results if they were identified during their childhood and was given proper training. It is even more effective to give training from childhood as there were minimal external factors influencing children at that stage. Therefore, Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Firstly, Some children who were born with special talents may not get access to resources that makes them use their talents effectively. This is due to many factors such as low financial background, geographical and cultural conditions of the country/state in which he was born and so on. For example, A child might be good at playing football from childhood but the lack of football training institutes in his availability inevitably hinders his skill in football. This type of conditions should not prevent a child from growing in his special talents.
In addition, Identifying and training of a child from early stages save a lot of money and time for them. Some people recognise their special talents after reaching adulthood and feel that they do not have enough time to excel in their inherent talents. Even though they find time to work on them, they feel it like a waste of money. So, if society can find such kind of people in advance and give them proper training, it might save them valuable assets like time and money.
Finally, proper training from early stages will make a child advance more rapidly when he becomes an individual. As he was given training from childhood, he will become proficient in those areas and is more likely to reach success. For instance, Virat Kohli, famous Indian cricket player, was joined in cricket academy when he was 13 by his mother, who recognised his exceptional talent in playing cricket. He said in an interview that the training he got from his childhood helped a lot throughout his career.
In conclusion, Society plays a major role in finding special talents in children and training them accordingly so that they can triumph in their respective careers.

Anyone heard from Warwick

whatsapp group india

$
0
0
Hie i will be making a whatsapp group within a week or so . Just message me your number i will add you in the group .
You can share good gre questions
remove your doubts
help fellow test takers

Alternative Careers

$
0
0
Hey all,

Firstly, I'd like to thank everyone for very helpful advice I've read on the forum.

A little background on my situation: I'm a junior, math and econ double major, some computer programming background. I'm thinking maybe a PhD isn't for me, as I'm not the workaholic type, and I don't think I want to spend the rest of my 20s working my *** off in graduate school, but I haven't completely eliminated the possibility.

I've been looking at career options, but it seems like there's a million different things I could do with a math/econ major and some basic computer programming skills. It's really hard to differentiate between typical "business jobs." Since I'm sure many of us share similar skill sets and interests, I was curious what backup careers everyone is/was considering at some point. I'm hoping to make a good amount of money, and do work that involves economic/mathematical thinking, not just boring mindless work. I've looked at becoming an actuary, but the tests seem like too much work for what's essentially a backup option at this point. Another option I've looked at is getting a masters in statistics and then working in industry, as I've heard the job prospects and pay are very good. Anyone else have non-academic job backups?

How can I transition to econ PhD from a science background?

$
0
0
Hi all, I am currently a physics PhD student going into my 2nd year. More than 6 months ago I became disillusioned with the field of physics and started developing an interest in economics. Over the past few months I've done some research and soul searching and became convinced that I am more intellectually interested in economics and would like to pursue that as an academic career. Unfortunately, I have not studied any economics at an undergraduate level (I am auditing intermediate micro/macro at my current institution). I would like to ask the community, what amount of preparation am I missing and what is the best path forward to secure an admission to an economics PhD program? Below is my profile:


PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: Top-tier Canadian (BS in Physics)
Undergrad GPA: 3.9
Type of Grad: Mid-tier Ivy
(PhD in Physics)
Grad GPA: 4.0
GRE: 167V/170Q/5.0
Math Courses: Calc I-III, Intro. Analysis, Linear Algebra I-II, Probability I, ODEs, PDEs, Complex Variables, Nonlinear Dynamics (one A- in Calc III, rest all A+)
Econ Courses: None!
Other Courses: Lots of physics, some chemistry, CS, biology, random humanities, mostly A/A+ with one B+.
Letters of Recommendation: Not any from econ faculty
Research Experience: 2 first author pub in press, another in prep (all in physics).
Teaching Experience: None
Research Interests: Most interested in macro, econometrics; not as interested in micro.
SOP: N/A
Other: N/A


What is the path from here onward to secure admissions to a strong econ PhD program? Time is not an issue, although I cannot afford to attend self-funded MA programs if the tuition is highly expensive.

My current possibilities:

1. Withdraw from physics PhD program and apply to econ MA programs?
2. Withdraw from physics PhD program and take courses and RA at my undergraduate institution as non-degree student.
3. Stay in the physics PhD program and take ~1 econ course per semester while trying to finish the PhD, and then apply for econ programs after 3-5 years? Does this sound too schizophrenic?
4. Something else? I'm not sure what other options I have.

Which of the above options seem like the most efficient way to prepare myself for a top tier econ program? How are my chances of changing fields?

(I am only interested in strong programs, as even though I much prefer to transfer to economics, if the best I can do after 2 years of preparation is going to a top-100 Podunk U., then I'd rather stay put.)

Is the American Institute for Economic Research a good place for a summer internship?

$
0
0
Hi,
I think that I have a really good shot at working at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) over the summer. In addition to that, I'm going to take a math class, ether at a local CC or state university, or online. Is the AIER a well-known organization? Can I get valuable experience there, and a good letter of recommendation from my boss for future research related internships and jobs?

BYU

$
0
0
How does BYU do so well getting students into top phd programs? They have lots of professors from top schools but they aren't particularly top researchers. It just seems so weird that BYU students seem kind of overrepresented to what would be expected from a school of its caliber.

Help! Please TOEFL Structure

$
0
0
1. Based on the premise that light was composed of color, the Impressionists came to the conclusion not really black
a. Which was that shadows
b. Was shadow which
c. Were shadows
d. That shadows were

what's the answer? D ? right ?

2. a parliamentary system, the prime minister must be appointed on the basis of the distribution of power in the parliament.
a. The considered
b. To be considered
c. Considering
d. Considers

The answer key is B, hey what's wrong with C?

3. The city of Beverly Hills is surrounded on the city of Los Angeles
a. Its sides
b. The sides are
c. It is the side of
d. All sides by

Oh please, I have no idea about this...why surrounded on? not surrounded by?

help me please! toefl structure!

$
0
0
1. Based on the premise that light was composed of color, the Impressionists came to the conclusion not really black
a. Which was that shadows
b. Was shadow which
c. Were shadows
d. That shadows were

whats the answer? D, right ?


2. a parliamentary system, the prime minister must be appointed on the basis of the distribution of power in the parliament.
a. The considered
b. To be considered
c. Considering
d. Considers

The answer key is B, whats wrong with C?

3. The city of Beverly Hills is surrounded on the city of Los Angeles
a. Its sides
b. The sides are
c. It is the side of
d. All sides by

I have no idea about this, why "surrounded on" not "surrounded by" ? and whats the answer for this?

please pleaseeee

Masters at ANU (compared to Europe)

$
0
0
Hi all,

I am planning on doing a masters to help the transition to an economics PhD from a scientific background. I have mainly looked at Europe but I also noticed the Australian National University as a posibility. The staff seems pretty good (a lot of top 50 US PhDs) and the courses don't look too bad (micro theory uses Jehle and Reny supported by MWG), but I was wondering if anyone knew anything more? How demanding is the material really? They don't have a placement record, is it considered strong enough to place somewhere decent in the US upon completion? How does it compare to European universities, say Tilburg?

Many thanks,

Wigmp

No yes till now means out for now?

$
0
0
I know most here have got at least one offer to consider or made their decision. Is there anyone who is with me, who has no yes till now, who started to consider plan B more seriously, who but still hopes for good news to come? or am I the only one going crazy checking status and email too oftern?

New student guides

MIT vs Stanford

$
0
0
Hey everyone,

Now that Harvard has apparently switched to "accept only former RA's", this seems to be the toughest decision out there for everyone who isn't already in Cambridge MA anyway.

How would you make this decision? Placement is incredible in both places, faculty is incredibly strong across all areas, location is lovely either way, even if in very different ways.

My interests are not in development, where MIT would be a clear winner, nor are they exclusively in market design or networks, where Stanford seems to have an edge.

Thoughts and impressions very welcome!

(I will attend visit days :) )

FPGEE Exam Oct 1st 2016

$
0
0
I am planing to give my FPGEE in october. Please help me with the books or any other study materials to refer. Thank you.

Maryland vs Penn State(any advice)

$
0
0
I have offers from Maryland and Penn State. While Maryland seems a more diverse department(good in every field), Penn state seems on an upward trajectory. Also UMD seems to have financial difficulty which may adversely affect faculty hiring and retention. Office of the President, University of Maryland
Please suggest.

What's up?

$
0
0
Hi everyone,

Sorry, I haven't been a very good moderator. I thought I would remain active on this site after I became an Assistant Professor but it didn't pan out. Although I am incredibly busy, that isn't really the primary reason I became inactive. I think the overall repetitive nature of the threads and the fact that the concerns on this site became more and more distant to my own pushed me away.

Anyways, this will probably be my last burst of activity. I was on the masters admissions committee for the last two years so I know how that works (here at least). Do you guys have any questions? Even though I was not directly involved with PhD admissions, I pretty much know how it's done as well.

I will say that I've seen a lot of talk about the financial conditions of various universities discussed Ad nauseam on here. However, I think most people don't know what's actually going on. Even if there are financial difficulties at the university level, the economics department might be fine. It depends on many factors such as the support of the Dean, Provost, and/or President. Grad students and especially undergrads are not really privy to this information.

Help with essay! First attempt - any feedback is greatly appreciated

$
0
0
Hi! I just discovered this website and am very excited and hopeful about receiving some feedback on my first practice essay. It may be a lofty goal, but I'm going for that perfect score, or at least a 5.5.
Below is the prompt, directions, then my response. Thank you so much for any/all feedback. I will repay the favor by contributing to other posts, hopefully I'll be helpful.

Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.


Most universities, especially public institutions, have very similar program requirements and structures in order to acquire a degree. These requirements usually include a conglomeration of options for classes within different fields of study. Especially in the early years of a university student's career, individuals oftentimes choose both classes that revolve around their specific interests as well as required general education classes that form a base of reasoning that the unversity has deemed necessary for all graduates.

Although there are potential flaws within this structure, the suggestion that universities should require students to take only courses within fields of interest seems to contain flaws as well. While in the current university structure, it is plausable that a fine arts student may have no need to take an introductory math course in order to graduate, this requirement adds to the idea of a 'well-rounded' graduate. While students should always have the option for choosing classes that revolve around their interests, they should not be required to only take those classes as that may close off exposure to topics they may not have considered.

The average incoming freshman at a university is about 18 years of age. It does not make logical sense for an 18 year old to know exactly what their areas of interest are or will be. We know that the prefrontal cortex of an 18 year old is not fully developed, meaning their higher reasoning and decision making is not as nuanced as an older individual. The fact that the average university student changes their major about five times throughout their college career exhibits this fact. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the average college student does not enter college knowing exactly what their interests are. Were this policy enforced in universities, there is at least a chance that students will never be introduced to a topic they never would have known they were interested in.

As the policy is stated, there is no distinction made between upperclassmen and lowerclassmen, which could present a problem. The current university structure is designed to hopefully expose students to a wide range of topics, both that the student knows they are interested in as well as general education topics that they will be exposed to. As the student continues their education, their focus becomes narrowed and they take classes towards the field of study they have chosen. If students at all stages of study are required to only take classes of interest, it may be more difficult to pin down a specific topic to go into further study. The construct of higher education currently enforces many college graduates with many different degrees to enter graduate school to further specify skills. If a student were required to take only courses of interest throughout their college career, they may have a more difficult time chosing a graduate program that suits the potentially noncohesive collection of classes they have chosen throughout their undergraduate experience.

While the currently structured process of procuring a university degree may leave something to be desired, the idea of students being required to take courses only within their field of interest poses a concern due to the nature of students changing areas of interest throughout college. While students should absolutely be encouraged to persue their interests, they should also be required to be exposed to topics they have not considered.

Help with essay - any feedback greatly appreciated!

$
0
0
Hi! I just discovered this website and am very excited and hopeful about receiving some feedback on my first practice essay. It may be a lofty goal, but I'm going for that perfect score, or at least a 5.5.
Below is the prompt, directions, then my response to my first practice essay. Thank you so much for any/all feedback. I will repay the favor by contributing to other posts, hopefully I'll be helpful at least as another pair of eyes :)



Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.


Most universities, especially public institutions, have very similar program requirements and structures in order to acquire a degree. These requirements usually include a conglomeration of options for classes within different fields of study. Especially in the early years of a university student's career, individuals oftentimes choose both classes that revolve around their specific interests as well as required general education classes that form a base of reasoning that the unversity has deemed necessary for all graduates.

Although there are potential flaws within this structure, the suggestion that universities should require students to take only courses within fields of interest seems to contain flaws as well. While in the current university structure, it is plausable that a fine arts student may have no need to take an introductory math course in order to graduate, this requirement adds to the idea of a 'well-rounded' graduate. While students should always have the option for choosing classes that revolve around their interests, they should not be required to only take those classes as that may close off exposure to topics they may not have considered.

The average incoming freshman at a university is about 18 years of age. It does not make logical sense for an 18 year old to know exactly what their areas of interest are or will be. We know that the prefrontal cortex of an 18 year old is not fully developed, meaning their higher reasoning and decision making is not as nuanced as an older individual. The fact that the average university student changes their major about five times throughout their college career exhibits this fact. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the average college student does not enter college knowing exactly what their interests are. Were this policy enforced in universities, there is at least a chance that students will never be introduced to a topic they never would have known they were interested in.

As the policy is stated, there is no distinction made between upperclassmen and lowerclassmen, which could present a problem. The current university structure is designed to hopefully expose students to a wide range of topics, both that the student knows they are interested in as well as general education topics that they will be exposed to. As the student continues their education, their focus becomes narrowed and they take classes towards the field of study they have chosen. If students at all stages of study are required to only take classes of interest, it may be more difficult to pin down a specific topic to go into further study. The construct of higher education currently enforces many college graduates with many different degrees to enter graduate school to further specify skills. If a student were required to take only courses of interest throughout their college career, they may have a more difficult time chosing a graduate program that suits the potentially noncohesive collection of classes they have chosen throughout their undergraduate experience.

While the currently structured process of procuring a university degree may leave something to be desired, the idea of students being required to take courses only within their field of interest poses a concern due to the nature of students changing areas of interest throughout college. While students should absolutely be encouraged to persue their interests, they should also be required to be exposed to topics they have not considered.
Viewing all 6904 articles
Browse latest View live